Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Section 14 of the Limitation Act

Home - Section 14 of the Limitation Act

CESTAT says “a litigant should not suffer for administrative delay beyond his control” — two-year departmental inaction cannot defeat the right to appeal and reassessment claims must be examined on merits
Posted inNews

CESTAT says “a litigant should not suffer for administrative delay beyond his control” — two-year departmental inaction cannot defeat the right to appeal and reassessment claims must be examined on merits

Court's decision The CESTAT Customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal Chennai allowed the appeals by way of remand, setting aside the appellate order which had rejected the appeals solely…
Posted by Rawlaw December 14, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Uncommunicated “good” ACR gradings cannot deny NFSG— “Rejection of promotion held arbitrary, officer entitled to reconsideration with benefits”
  • Bombay High Court: Section 29A time limit inapplicable to highway land acquisition arbitration — “Delayed award upheld, no patent illegality in compensation”
  • Bombay High Court: Unconditional stay of arbitral award denied — “Deposit of entire award justified as no exceptional case” made out
  • Bombay High Court: Changing selection criteria after recruitment begins is arbitrary— “Weightage method struck down, candidates with higher marks ordered to be appointed”
  • Bombay High Court: Arbitral award set aside upheld — “Lack of proof of membership renders arbitration under cooperative law without jurisdiction”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top