Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

section 28A

Home - section 28A

redetermination
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rules in Favour of Landowner: “Rejection on Delay Does Not Bar Right to Seek Re-determination” — Section 28-A Application Maintainable Despite Failed Section 18 Reference

Court’s Decision In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court set aside the rejection of a landowner's application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, observing that the…
Posted by Rawlaw August 1, 2025
allows withdrawal
Posted inNews

Orissa High Court Allows Withdrawal of Plea Challenging Rejection Under Land Acquisition Act: “Since Compensation is Now Sanctioned, No Difficulty in Disposal Under Section 28-A”

Court’s Decision: The Orissa High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition seeking quashing of the rejection order under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The…
Posted by Rawlaw June 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top