Section 29(2)(b)

Home - Section 29(2)(b)

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Garden of God cannot erase the name of Karim” — Court upholds trademark rights of iconic restaurant but modifies injunction with disclaimer direction

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court held that the restaurant operating under the name Gulshan-e-Karim infringed upon the registered trademark KARIM used by the famous Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd., whose…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 14, 2025

Recent News

Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required

Scroll to Top