Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Section 31

Home » Section 31
Delhi High Court: “Triple identity established — mark, products, and consumers identical” — Court restrains use of ‘Lotus Salon’ for infringing the well-known trademark ‘LOTUS’ of Lotus Herbals
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Triple identity established — mark, products, and consumers identical” — Court restrains use of ‘Lotus Salon’ for infringing the well-known trademark ‘LOTUS’ of Lotus Herbals

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark “LOTUS SALON” or any deceptively similar variation in connection with beauty salon…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Validity of Arbitral Award Signed by Majority under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: “Signing Is Not a Mere Formality — It Gives Life to an Award”
Posted inNews

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Validity of Arbitral Award Signed by Majority under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: “Signing Is Not a Mere Formality — It Gives Life to an Award”

Court’s Decision The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in a significant pronouncement by Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari and Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, dismissed an international commercial arbitration appeal challenging the validity…
Posted by Rawlaw October 17, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court sets aside NHAI debarment over toll plaza violations — “Blacklisting is civil death; cryptic orders and undisclosed complaints cannot sustain it” while upholding contract termination
  • Delhi High Court quashes repeated suspension of defence supplier — “Indefinite suspension without pending investigation is arbitrary and worse than blacklisting” while restoring business dealings
  • Delhi High Court dismisses State appeal in abetment to suicide case — “Mere extramarital affair, without proximate instigation, cannot sustain Section 306 charge” while affirming acquittal
  • Delhi High Court partially restores chillies export incentive scheme — “Foreign trade benefits cannot be withdrawn retrospectively, but exporters gain only from date of lawful operation”
  • Delhi High Court questions unexplained second CRCL clarification in tobacco exports — “Fresh adverse findings without resampling or reasons cannot stall refunds” while directing time-bound decision
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top