Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

section34

Home - section34

dismissed
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court dismisses challenge to 2008 BSE arbitral award — ‘Jurisdiction objections cannot be raised for the first time under Section 34; no patent illegality shown’

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court rejected the Section 34 petition filed by a trading client challenging a 2008 arbitral award passed under the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Rules.…
Posted by Rawlaw December 6, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Uncommunicated “good” ACR gradings cannot deny NFSG— “Rejection of promotion held arbitrary, officer entitled to reconsideration with benefits”
  • Bombay High Court: Section 29A time limit inapplicable to highway land acquisition arbitration — “Delayed award upheld, no patent illegality in compensation”
  • Bombay High Court: Unconditional stay of arbitral award denied — “Deposit of entire award justified as no exceptional case” made out
  • Bombay High Court: Changing selection criteria after recruitment begins is arbitrary— “Weightage method struck down, candidates with higher marks ordered to be appointed”
  • Bombay High Court: Arbitral award set aside upheld — “Lack of proof of membership renders arbitration under cooperative law without jurisdiction”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top