Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Sections 114 and 114AA

Home - Sections 114 and 114AA

CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
Posted inNews

CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case

Court’s decision The CESTAT Mumbai, allowed the appeal filed by an export house challenging confiscation, penalties, and denial of export benefits imposed under the Customs Act. The Tribunal held that…
Posted by Rawlaw December 1, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top