Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Home - Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Bombay High Court Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, ruled that the arbitral award of ₹11.21 crore granted by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator was invalid. The court…
Posted by Rawlaw January 14, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top