Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Home - Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Bombay High Court Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Sets Aside ₹11.21 Crore Arbitral Award: Declares Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Void Ab Initio for Breach of Arbitration Agreement and Public Policy Violations

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, ruled that the arbitral award of ₹11.21 crore granted by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator was invalid. The court…
Posted by Rawlaw January 14, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court Grants Regular Pay Scale to Temporary Employees Appointed Under Special Recruitment Drive, Sets Aside Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Division Bench Judgment for Arbitrary Denial of Benefits
  • Bombay High Court: Liquidated Damages Cannot Be Automatically Enforced—Award of ₹6,01,000 Reduced to ₹3,00,000 as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Actual Loss, Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act Applied to Limit Compensation
  • Supreme Court Quashes Rape FIR Against Husband, Holds That Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC Applies in Legally Recognized Marriages and SIT Report Corroborates Voluntary Marriage
  • Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 73AAA of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; Rejects Challenge to Restriction on Number of Directors in Tribal Development Corporation
  • Delhi High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Proceedings: Holds That Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 149(1) Are Invalid Despite TOLA Extensions
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top