Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Special Leave Petition

Home - Special Leave Petition

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition as Withdrawn: “Petitioner Must Stand by Election to Withdraw; Court Will Not Interfere Further” — Procedural Order Reaffirms Limits of Appellate Review
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition as Withdrawn: “Petitioner Must Stand by Election to Withdraw; Court Will Not Interfere Further” — Procedural Order Reaffirms Limits of Appellate Review

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petition after the petitioner expressly sought permission to withdraw it. The Court recorded the request and ordered that the petition…
Posted by Rawlaw November 7, 2025
Supreme Court Dismisses Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation’s Plea Against JMD Industries, Cites Insufficient Grounds for Condoning 1000-Day Delay, Upholds Compensation Order”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Dismisses Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation’s Plea Against JMD Industries, Cites Insufficient Grounds for Condoning 1000-Day Delay, Upholds Compensation Order”

Court’s Decision:The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (HSIIDC) and others, citing a delay of 1024 days in…
Posted by Rawlaw September 14, 2024

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top