Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Suffering

Home - Suffering

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation to ₹37.51 Lakhs: Fixes Monthly Income at ₹10,000, Recognizes 100% Functional Disability, Overrules Lower Courts' Findings, and Revises Awards for Pain, Suffering, and Future Prospects
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation to ₹37.51 Lakhs: Fixes Monthly Income at ₹10,000, Recognizes 100% Functional Disability, Overrules Lower Courts’ Findings, and Revises Awards for Pain, Suffering, and Future Prospects

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal filed by the claimant, revising the compensation awarded in a motor accident case to ₹37,51,000. It fixed the claimant's monthly…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025
Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Road Accident Case to ₹28.93 Lakhs: Recognizes 90% Functional Disability, Corrects Age to 22, and Includes Non-Pecuniary Damages for Pain, Suffering, and Loss of Marriage Prospects
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Road Accident Case to ₹28.93 Lakhs: Recognizes 90% Functional Disability, Corrects Age to 22, and Includes Non-Pecuniary Damages for Pain, Suffering, and Loss of Marriage Prospects

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court modified the compensation awarded to the appellant (the claimant in a road accident case) to ₹28,93,494, significantly increasing the amount from ₹6,70,000 awarded by the…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025
Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim Injured in 2008 Collision with Rashly Driven Lorry to ₹1.02 Crores: "Compensation Must Reflect Pain, Suffering, and Permanent Disability"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim Injured in 2008 Collision with Rashly Driven Lorry to ₹1.02 Crores: “Compensation Must Reflect Pain, Suffering, and Permanent Disability”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation payable to the appellant to ₹1,02,29,241. The Court revised two key components: Future Prospects: Increased the addition for future income to 50%…
Posted by Rawlaw November 25, 2024

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top