Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence”

Home - Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence"

Delhi High Court Denies Condonation of 565-Day Delay in Filing Appeal: "Educated Litigants Must Diligently Track Their Cases, Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Condonation of 565-Day Delay in Filing Appeal: “Educated Litigants Must Diligently Track Their Cases, Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence”

Court's Decision: The Delhi High Court refused to condone a delay of 565 days in filing an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The court…
Posted by Rawlaw February 15, 2025

Recent News

  • “He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity”: Supreme Court Holds Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Is Not Deposited Within Time
  • Bombay High Court Rejects Tenants’ Plea To Add New Developer; Says Application Prima Facie Appears “Moved And Financed” By Proposed Developer, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail In Pending Murder Appeal; Says “Bail Once Granted Ought Not To Be Cancelled” Without Strong Grounds
  • Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank And Phoenix ARC Officials Filed After Recovery Proceedings; Says “Personal Vendetta Writ Large”, Investigation Would Be Abuse Of Process
  • “Plainly A Case Of Accidental Death”: Bombay High Court Quashes Case Against Kho-Kho Trainer In Student’s Road Accident Death After R-Mall Visit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top