Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer

Home » Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer
Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court ruled that interest on compensation under Section 4A(3) of the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, is mandatory at 12% per annum when an employer defaults in…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court upholds revocation of letter of administration — “Obtained after 22 years by suppressing widow and daughter; probate court cannot reward concealment” while dismissing heirs’ appeal
  • Delhi High Court grants default bail in NDPS case — “Extension of investigation without producing accused is a gross illegality; right to statutory bail flows from Article 21” while setting aside trial court orders
  • Delhi High Court holds insurer liable for tractor–trolley death and recalculates compensation — “Trailer accident flows from insured tractor; welfare object of Motor Vehicles Act cannot be defeated by technicalities” while marginally enhancing award
  • Delhi High Court declines to quash reassessment at threshold — “Limitation under Section 149 post-Ashish Agarwal requires factual computation by Assessing Officer” while remanding matter
  • Delhi High Court upholds finding on genuineness of Will despite dismissal of probate — “Proof of execution can stand independent of probate relief; secondary evidence admissible on proof of loss” while rejecting son’s challenge
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top