Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency” – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Home - "Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency" – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Bombay High Court: "Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency" – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency” – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by Mahendra Realtors & Infrastructure Ltd. and Dev Engineers, challenging their technical disqualification from a tender process. The court…
Posted by Rawlaw February 12, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top