Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency” – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Home - "Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency" – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Bombay High Court: "Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency" – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Tender Authority is the Best Judge of its Requirements; Judicial Interference Limited to Ensuring Fairness and Transparency” – Petition Challenging Tender Rejected

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by Mahendra Realtors & Infrastructure Ltd. and Dev Engineers, challenging their technical disqualification from a tender process. The court…
Posted by Rawlaw February 12, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court Allows Foreign Travel Despite Alleged ₹1626.74 Crore Bank Fraud, Suspends LOCs issued by CBI and ED — “Right to Travel Integral to Article 21; Vague Apprehensions Cannot Override Personal Liberty”
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash Sugar Mill Licence – “Challenge to Continuation of Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum (IEM) for Shivneri Sugars Ltd. Unfounded; No Material to Prove Government’s Recognition of Existing Sugar Factory Was Arbitrary or Illegal”
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses Applications for De-Freezing of Assets in Rs. 1,260 Crore Religare Finvest Limited fraud case – “Mere invocation of educational need, without presenting a concrete, detailed, and credible plan cannot justify the sweeping relief they seek”
  • Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Poppy Straw—”Section 37 NDPS Act Rigorously Applies; Twin Conditions Not Satisfied”
  • Delhi High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing Auction of Defaulter’s Property — “DRT, by repeatedly extending time and setting aside an auction where no illegality was established, had erred in law; DRT’s final relief setting aside a lawfully conducted auction was an overreach.”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top