Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Trade Marks Act

Home - Trade Marks Act

Madras High Court orders cancellation of trademark saying “registration obtained after compromise decree cannot be sustained” — court expunges ‘Sangeetham House of Veg’ mark for suppression of material facts
Posted inNews

Madras High Court orders cancellation of trademark saying “registration obtained after compromise decree cannot be sustained” — court expunges ‘Sangeetham House of Veg’ mark for suppression of material facts

Court's decision The Madras High Court allowed a rectification petition and directed the removal, expungement, and cancellation of a registered trademark from the Trademark Register. The Court held that the…
Posted by Rawlaw December 12, 2025
Delhi High Court: “Triple identity established — mark, products, and consumers identical” — Court restrains use of ‘Lotus Salon’ for infringing the well-known trademark ‘LOTUS’ of Lotus Herbals
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Triple identity established — mark, products, and consumers identical” — Court restrains use of ‘Lotus Salon’ for infringing the well-known trademark ‘LOTUS’ of Lotus Herbals

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark “LOTUS SALON” or any deceptively similar variation in connection with beauty salon…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Delhi High Court: “Garden of God cannot erase the name of Karim” — Court upholds trademark rights of iconic restaurant but modifies injunction with disclaimer direction
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Garden of God cannot erase the name of Karim” — Court upholds trademark rights of iconic restaurant but modifies injunction with disclaimer direction

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court held that the restaurant operating under the name Gulshan-e-Karim infringed upon the registered trademark KARIM used by the famous Karim Hotels Pvt. Ltd., whose…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Delhi High Court: “A businessman cannot monopolise a generic floral word” — Court denies injunction in the TULIP trademark dispute over perfumes and cotton products
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “A businessman cannot monopolise a generic floral word” — Court denies injunction in the TULIP trademark dispute over perfumes and cotton products

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court refused to grant an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark “AGN TULIP” for perfumes, holding that the plaintiff’s trademark “TULIPS”, though…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Delhi High Court: “Descriptive marks can gain distinctiveness through continuous use” — Court restrains rival from using ‘SACHAMOTI’ for tapioca sago after decades of goodwill established by original user
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Descriptive marks can gain distinctiveness through continuous use” — Court restrains rival from using ‘SACHAMOTI’ for tapioca sago after decades of goodwill established by original user

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court, through Justice Prathiba M. Singh, granted an injunction restraining the defendant from using the trademark “SACHAMOTI” for tapioca sago and related edible products, holding…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Bombay High Court’s 3 Striking Findings: Dishonest Adoption Invalid — ‘LE SHARK’ Trademark Scrapped for False Evidence
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court’s 3 Striking Findings: Dishonest Adoption Invalid — ‘LE SHARK’ Trademark Scrapped for False Evidence

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, in a major verdict reinforcing integrity in trademark law, expunged the Indian registration of the “LE SHARK” trademark held by the Respondents under Registration…
Posted by Rawlaw October 15, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top