Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

trademark dispute

Home - trademark dispute

Delhi High Court: “A businessman cannot monopolise a generic floral word” — Court denies injunction in the TULIP trademark dispute over perfumes and cotton products
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “A businessman cannot monopolise a generic floral word” — Court denies injunction in the TULIP trademark dispute over perfumes and cotton products

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court refused to grant an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark “AGN TULIP” for perfumes, holding that the plaintiff’s trademark “TULIPS”, though…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025
Delhi High Court: “Well-Known Marks Deserve the Highest Protection” – Permanent Injunction Granted in PRINCTON vs PRINCETON Trademark Dispute
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Well-Known Marks Deserve the Highest Protection” – Permanent Injunction Granted in PRINCTON vs PRINCETON Trademark Dispute

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off in favour of the plaintiff, a globally renowned academic institution, against the defendants using deceptively…
Posted by Rawlaw October 1, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
  • Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
  • Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
  • Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
  • Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top