Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Upholds Arbitrator’s Appointment in Custom Milled Rice Dispute: Reinforces Waiver Doctrine and Importance of Raising Jurisdictional Objections at the Earliest Stage in Arbitration

Home - Upholds Arbitrator’s Appointment in Custom Milled Rice Dispute: Reinforces Waiver Doctrine and Importance of Raising Jurisdictional Objections at the Earliest Stage in Arbitration

Allahabad High Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Appointment in Custom Milled Rice Dispute: Reinforces Waiver Doctrine and Importance of Raising Jurisdictional Objections at the Earliest Stage in Arbitration
Posted inNews

Allahabad High Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Appointment in Custom Milled Rice Dispute: Reinforces Waiver Doctrine and Importance of Raising Jurisdictional Objections at the Earliest Stage in Arbitration

Court's Decision This case revolves around a dispute concerning the recovery of dues related to the Custom Milled Rice (CMR) scheme. The petitioner is engaged in the business of milling…
Posted by Rawlaw February 20, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top