Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Upholds Preventive Detention Under PSA for Alleged Terrorist Links: “Specific and Proximate Allegations

Home » Upholds Preventive Detention Under PSA for Alleged Terrorist Links: "Specific and Proximate Allegations
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Preventive Detention Under PSA for Alleged Terrorist Links: "Specific and Proximate Allegations, Procedural Compliance Justify Detention to Safeguard State Security"
Posted inNews

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Preventive Detention Under PSA for Alleged Terrorist Links: “Specific and Proximate Allegations, Procedural Compliance Justify Detention to Safeguard State Security”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh upheld the preventive detention of the detenue under the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978. The court ruled that: The…
Posted by Rawlaw January 9, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court upholds revocation of letter of administration — “Obtained after 22 years by suppressing widow and daughter; probate court cannot reward concealment” while dismissing heirs’ appeal
  • Delhi High Court grants default bail in NDPS case — “Extension of investigation without producing accused is a gross illegality; right to statutory bail flows from Article 21” while setting aside trial court orders
  • Delhi High Court holds insurer liable for tractor–trolley death and recalculates compensation — “Trailer accident flows from insured tractor; welfare object of Motor Vehicles Act cannot be defeated by technicalities” while marginally enhancing award
  • Delhi High Court declines to quash reassessment at threshold — “Limitation under Section 149 post-Ashish Agarwal requires factual computation by Assessing Officer” while remanding matter
  • Delhi High Court upholds finding on genuineness of Will despite dismissal of probate — “Proof of execution can stand independent of probate relief; secondary evidence admissible on proof of loss” while rejecting son’s challenge
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top