Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Upholds Sarpanch’s Disqualification for Allowing Husband’s Interference and Alleged Bribery Demand

Home - Upholds Sarpanch’s Disqualification for Allowing Husband’s Interference and Alleged Bribery Demand

Bombay High Court Upholds Sarpanch’s Disqualification for Allowing Husband’s Interference and Alleged Bribery Demand, Citing Misconduct Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds Sarpanch’s Disqualification for Allowing Husband’s Interference and Alleged Bribery Demand, Citing Misconduct Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of a Sarpanch from the Gat Gram Panchayat, Raher Adgaon. The petitioner was removed from office under…
Posted by Rawlaw January 30, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top