Court’s Decision
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband’s appeal challenging the Family Court’s order granting Rs. 25,000 per month as interim maintenance to the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, upholding that the wife’s mere capability to earn is not sufficient to deny maintenance in the absence of actual income. The Court found no infirmity in the Family Court’s assessment of the husband’s income, rejection of the argument of financial liabilities, and calculation of maintenance considering social status, needs, and liabilities.
Facts
The husband and wife were married in January 2022, and a male child was born in June 2023, who is presently in the wife’s custody. Due to matrimonial discord, the parties began living separately. The husband filed for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act in August 2023. During the proceedings, the wife filed an application under Section 24 seeking interim maintenance, which was allowed by the Family Court granting Rs. 25,000 per month from the date of filing until disposal of the case, leading to the present appeal by the husband challenging this grant.
Issues
- Whether the Family Court erred in granting interim maintenance to the wife without considering her educational qualifications and potential employability.
- Whether the Family Court correctly assessed the husband’s income while considering his financial liabilities, including EMIs, parental care, and other responsibilities.
- Whether mere capability to earn can be a ground to deny interim maintenance.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The husband argued that the Family Court failed to consider that the wife was educated, capable of maintaining herself, and hence not entitled to maintenance. He submitted that his financial liabilities, including EMIs, loans, and expenses for the care of his paralytic father and elderly parents, were ignored while calculating his disposable income. Relying on Chetram Mali v. Karishma Saini (2023), it was argued that the Family Court ought to have considered his duties towards other family members and financial obligations before determining maintenance.
Respondent’s Arguments
The wife pleaded that she was not earning and lacked sufficient income for her sustenance and to care for the child in her custody. She argued that despite her educational qualifications, she did not have a source of income and that mere potential employability cannot disentitle her to maintenance under the settled principles of law ensuring that a wife should live with dignity as per the status and lifestyle she was accustomed to in her matrimonial home.
Analysis of the Law
The Court reiterated that under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act:
- Maintenance pendente lite is granted if the applicant lacks independent income sufficient for her maintenance or to meet necessary litigation expenses.
- The wife’s capability to earn and actual earnings are distinct considerations (Shailja v. Khobbanna (2018) 12 SCC 199).
- The financial position of the wife’s parents or her mere educational qualifications cannot defeat a maintenance claim (Manish Jain v. Akanksha Jain (2017) 15 SCC 801).
- The lifestyle, status, and social background of the parties are relevant factors.
- Maintenance should not be excessive or extortionate but adequate to ensure a dignified life.
Precedent Analysis
The Court discussed and applied:
- Shailja v. Khobbanna (2018): Capability to earn is different from actual earnings.
- Binita Dass v. Uttam Kumar (2019): Qualification and earning capacity alone cannot deny maintenance where the wife lacks an actual income.
- Jasbir Kaur Sehgal v. District Judge, Dehradun (1997): Courts may use reasonable guesswork when parties conceal true income.
- Manish Jain v. Akanksha Jain (2017): Maintenance should reflect the parties’ status and dignity of the wife, independent of her educational qualifications.
- Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena (2015): Maintenance laws are meant to prevent destitution and financial suffering of women separated from their matrimonial homes.
These precedents reinforced the position that the husband’s statutory liability to maintain his wife cannot be avoided unless there is clear proof of her independent income.
Court’s Reasoning
The Court noted that the husband’s claim of a monthly income of Rs. 60,000 with expenses of Rs. 55,000 was inconsistent with the bank credit entries, which revealed higher income inflows (e.g., Rs. 1,24,500 in December 2023, Rs. 1,37,650 in November 2023, Rs. 60,000 in October 2023). The Family Court rightly considered the Income Tax Returns and bank statements, applied reasoned guesswork due to discrepancies, and assessed the income at Rs. 1,00,000 per month.
It held:
“Capability to earn and actual earnings are distinct considerations, and in the absence of any cogent evidence establishing the respondent/wife’s present employment or income, no adverse inference can be drawn against her merely on the grounds of her alleged capability of gaining employment.”
The Court further underscored that the wife is entitled to live with the dignity she would have in the matrimonial home, and the quantum of Rs. 25,000 per month was fair after accounting for EMIs and other responsibilities.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Family Court’s order granting Rs. 25,000 per month as interim maintenance was justified and legally sound, ensuring the wife’s right to live with dignity during the pendency of matrimonial proceedings, and the husband’s objections lacked merit.
Implications
- Reinforces that a wife’s educational qualification or theoretical capacity to earn cannot defeat her claim for interim maintenance if she lacks actual income.
- Ensures that courts must consider the lifestyle, status, and reasonable needs of the wife and child while deciding interim maintenance.
- Emphasizes transparent income disclosures by husbands to avoid adverse inferences during maintenance adjudications.
- Provides clarity for family law practitioners in assessing income and maintenance calculations where income is disputed.
FAQs
1. Can an educated wife claim interim maintenance under the Hindu Marriage Act?
Yes, the Delhi High Court reaffirmed that mere educational qualifications do not defeat the right to claim maintenance if the wife lacks an actual income.
2. Does the husband’s financial liability towards parents impact interim maintenance calculation?
The Court held that while financial liabilities can be considered, they do not exempt the husband from his statutory obligation to maintain his wife adequately.
3. How is income assessed if the husband’s declared income and lifestyle do not match?
Courts can use reasonable guesswork, relying on bank transactions, ITRs, and lifestyle indicators to assess true income for maintenance determination.
Also Read: Delhi High Court Upholds Promotees’ Seniority in Airports Authority Recruitment Over Direct Recruits
