Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Abuse of Process

Home - Abuse of Process

minor coparcener
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Restores Minor Coparceners’ HUF Property Suit, Says “Threshold Dismissal on Abuse of Process Must Follow Order VII Rule 11 Parameters”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court set aside the order of a Single Judge who had dismissed a declaratory suit filed by minors through their natural guardian, on the ground…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Quashes-Criminal-Proceedings-Against-In-Laws-For-Cruelty-Under-Section-498A-IPC-There-is-no-specific-allegation-regarding-anyone-of-the-petitioners-except-common-and-generate
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws For Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: “There is no specific allegation regarding anyone of the petitioners except common and general allegations against all”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in its order dated 09.06.2025, quashed the criminal proceedings against the in-laws (petitioner nos. 2 and 3) of the complainant under Section 498A/34 IPC,…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top