Bombay High Court: “Suppression or concealment of material facts is not advocacy — it is jugglery, manipulation, and misrepresentation, which has no place in equitable jurisdiction.” Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost for Suppression of Facts in Slum Rehab Case — “Litigants Cannot Play Hide and Seek with the Court”
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Suppression or concealment of material facts is not advocacy — it is jugglery, manipulation, and misrepresentation, which has no place in equitable jurisdiction.” Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost for Suppression of Facts in Slum Rehab Case — “Litigants Cannot Play Hide and Seek with the Court”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Division Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Kamal Khata) dismissed a review petition filed by an individual claiming entitlement to a rehabilitation tenement…
October 28, 2025
Andhra Pradesh high court
Posted inNews

Andhra Pradesh High Court Reiterates that Section 115 CPC cannot be invoked against procedural notices in execution proceedings and Imposes ₹25,000 Cost on Counsel for Misleading the Court: “Advocacy Is a Noble Profession, Not the Sorriest of Trades”

Court’s Decision The Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari, dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed by a judgment debtor challenging a notice issued by the…
October 17, 2025