Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Home - Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Page 2

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Validity of Arbitral Award Signed by Majority under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: “Signing Is Not a Mere Formality — It Gives Life to an Award”
Posted inNews

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Validity of Arbitral Award Signed by Majority under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: “Signing Is Not a Mere Formality — It Gives Life to an Award”

Court’s Decision The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in a significant pronouncement by Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari and Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, dismissed an international commercial arbitration appeal challenging the validity…
Posted by Rawlaw October 17, 2025
Bombay High Court’s 3 Powerful Findings: Upholds Arbitral Award — Rejects State’s Unfair Liquidated Damages for Impossible Connectivity
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court’s 3 Powerful Findings: Upholds Arbitral Award — Rejects State’s Unfair Liquidated Damages for Impossible Connectivity

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, through Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, upheld an arbitral award dated 17 December 2021 in favour of a private technology service provider engaged by the State…
Posted by Rawlaw October 15, 2025
Anti-Arbitration injunction
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Declares: Section 5 is a Strong Shield Against Anti-Arbitration Interference

Court’s Decision The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition seeking an anti-arbitration injunction to restrain arbitral proceedings initiated before the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre. The Division Bench comprising Chief…
Posted by Rawlaw October 9, 2025
arbitration and conciliation act
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Reasons in Impugned Award are Cryptic, Skimpy and Summary” – Court Sets Aside MSMED Facilitation Council Award under Section 34 of Arbitration Act

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under the MSMED Act, 2006, holding that the reasoning was…
Posted by Rawlaw October 2, 2025
Bombay High Court: Arbitrator though not a lawyer, was best suited to assess architectural disputes; Upholds arbitral award – “In an LLP, liability cannot be automatically extended to partners”
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: Arbitrator though not a lawyer, was best suited to assess architectural disputes; Upholds arbitral award – “In an LLP, liability cannot be automatically extended to partners”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Proteus Ventures LLP and its designated partners challenging an…
Posted by Rawlaw October 2, 2025
Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting High Court Views, Holds Time Extension for Arbitral Award Under Section 29A Can Be Sought After Expiry of Prescribed Period
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting High Court Views, Holds Time Extension for Arbitral Award Under Section 29A Can Be Sought After Expiry of Prescribed Period

Court’s Decision:The Supreme Court ruled that an application for the extension of time for making an arbitral award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A &…
Posted by Rawlaw September 13, 2024

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 2

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top