Bombay High Court Upholds Ministerial Role of Chief Judicial Magistrate Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act: Procedural Defects in Bank’s Application Not Grounds for Dismissal; No Notice Required to Borrowers During Possession Process

Bombay High Court Upholds Ministerial Role of Chief Judicial Magistrate Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act: Procedural Defects in Bank’s Application Not Grounds for Dismissal; No Notice Required to Borrowers During Possession Process

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by borrowers challenging the Chief Judicial Magistrate's (CJM) denial of their request to obtain copies of documents submitted by…
Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate, Rejects Objections Based on Agricultural Designation in Regional Plan: Holds Permissions Granted Under MRTP Act Prevail Over Subsequent UDCPR Regulations

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate, Rejects Objections Based on Agricultural Designation in Regional Plan: Holds Permissions Granted Under MRTP Act Prevail Over Subsequent UDCPR Regulations

Court’s Decision : The Bombay High Court instructed authorities to issue the Occupation Certificate (OC) to the petitioner for their completed residential-cum-commercial project within eight weeks. The court affirmed that…
Bombay High Court Upholds Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction in Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act, Clarifies Inapplicability of Rent Control Protections to Government-Owned Land: “Public Premises Act Overrides Rent Control Acts for Government Leases”

Bombay High Court Upholds Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction in Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act, Clarifies Inapplicability of Rent Control Protections to Government-Owned Land: “Public Premises Act Overrides Rent Control Acts for Government Leases”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Estate Officer's jurisdiction to entertain an eviction petition under the Public Premises Act. It held that the Bombay…
Bombay High Court Directs Maharashtra to Release ₹1.25 Crore Export Subsidy to Petitioner, Rejects Procedural Objections and Double Benefit Claims: “Denying Welfare Benefits Violates Equality Under Article 14 and Undermines Public Trust”

Bombay High Court Directs Maharashtra to Release ₹1.25 Crore Export Subsidy to Petitioner, Rejects Procedural Objections and Double Benefit Claims: “Denying Welfare Benefits Violates Equality Under Article 14 and Undermines Public Trust”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court directed the State of Maharashtra to disburse ₹1.25 crore to the petitioner under the Export Subsidy Scheme. The court rejected the state's arguments against…
Bombay High Court Directs State to Release ₹4.79 Crores Subsidy to Petitioner, Holds "Denial of Subsidy Violates Article 14; State Must Adhere to Assurances Under GR Dated 31st July 2018," Rejects Procedural and Double Benefit Objections

Bombay High Court Directs State to Release ₹4.79 Crores Subsidy to Petitioner, Holds “Denial of Subsidy Violates Article 14; State Must Adhere to Assurances Under GR Dated 31st July 2018,” Rejects Procedural and Double Benefit Objections

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court directed the State of Maharashtra to release ₹4,79,94,000 as export subsidy to the petitioner within six weeks. The court emphasized that denying the subsidy…