Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Bombay High Court

Home - Bombay High Court - Page 5

covenenat
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court refuses to stay 30-foot height covenant in Altamount Road redevelopment dispute—“Plaintiff cannot approbate and reprobate its own title”; interim relief denied

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application filed by a cooperative housing society seeking permission to proceed with redevelopment beyond a 30-foot height restriction contained in…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
santacruz footpath
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court slams 20-year encroachment on Santacruz footpath—“No title, no right, no equity”; Section 314 demolition upheld, ₹5 lakh costs imposed

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court dismissed an Appeal From Order challenging the City Civil Court’s refusal to grant interim injunction against demolition of a roadside structure under Section…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
temple land dispute
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court refers temple land dispute to arbitration—Society a “Veritable party to flat purchase arbitration clause”; Section 11 court won’t pre-judge arbitrability

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court allowed two Section 11 applications and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between a developer, a Jain temple trust, and a cooperative…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
sweeper compensation
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court directs immediate ₹50 lakh Covid compensation to sweeper’s family—“Technicalities cannot defeat frontline sacrifice”; Collector barred from fresh scrutiny, timeline fixed

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of a Class IV municipal employee who died due to Covid-19 while deployed as…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
tata dealership
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court condones 91-day delay in Tata dealership arbitration—“Mandate ends, not the arbitration”; substitute arbitrator appointed under Section 11

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court allowed two Commercial Arbitration Applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a substitute sole arbitrator to…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
anganwadi
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court upholds option rule for Anganwadi Sevikas elected to Panchayat—“No dual holding of posts”; termination quashed after resignation from elected office

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) upheld the validity of the Government Resolution dated 05 August 2010 requiring an Anganwadi Sevika elected as a Village Panchayat member…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
specific performance
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court refuses to reject 28-year-old specific performance suit at threshold—“Limitation and fraud are mixed questions”; Order VII Rule 11(d) plea dismissed

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the trial court’s refusal to…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
zilla parsishad
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court directs clubbing of Zilla Parishad and aided school service for pension—“Rule 153 mandates combination of pensionable service”; 2010 rejection order quashed

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of a retired Head Master seeking clubbing of his Zilla Parishad service…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
tahsildar rasta
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court rejects civil suit challenging Tahsildar’s Rasta order—“Appeal and civil suit under Section 143 are mutually exclusive”; one-year limitation strictly enforced

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed a Civil Revision Application and set aside the trial court’s order refusing to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026
anticipatory bail
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court refuses withdrawal of ₹10 lakh deposited for anticipatory bail—“Deposit without prejudice is not compensation”; complainant must await trial outcome

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed a criminal application seeking withdrawal of ₹10 lakh deposited by an accused as a condition recorded during anticipatory bail proceedings.…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2026

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 66 Next page

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top