Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Calcutta High Court

Home » Calcutta High Court » Page 10
Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Husband's Age Barrier: Married Woman Allowed to Access Assisted Reproductive Technology Services, Pursue Motherhood Dreams.
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Husband’s Age Barrier: Married Woman Allowed to Access Assisted Reproductive Technology Services, Pursue Motherhood Dreams.

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court ruled that a married woman can independently access Assisted Reproductive Technology Services (ARTS) even if her husband does not meet the prescribed age criteria…
Posted by Rawlaw December 6, 2024
Calcutta High Court: "Adverse Possession Claims Require Trial; Dismissal Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limited to Clear Cases of Law Bar or Lack of Cause of Action"
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: “Adverse Possession Claims Require Trial; Dismissal Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limited to Clear Cases of Law Bar or Lack of Cause of Action”

Court’s Decision: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court’s order rejecting the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the issues…
Posted by Rawlaw November 28, 2024
Calcutta High Court: Acceptance of Amended Plaint Without Compliance with Procedural Mandates Declared Illegal; Procedural Rigor and Verification Rules Under CPC Reaffirmed
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Acceptance of Amended Plaint Without Compliance with Procedural Mandates Declared Illegal; Procedural Rigor and Verification Rules Under CPC Reaffirmed

Court’s Decision: The High Court of Calcutta, invoking its power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution, held that the Trial Court erred in accepting an amended plaint filed…
Posted by Rawlaw November 27, 2024
Calcutta High Court: Adverse Possession Requires Trial to Prove Essential Conditions; Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 Must Be Based Solely on Plaint’s Averments
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Adverse Possession Requires Trial to Prove Essential Conditions; Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 Must Be Based Solely on Plaint’s Averments

Court's Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed the defendant's civil revision application challenging the trial court's order that refused to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit under Order 7 Rule 11 of…
Posted by Rawlaw November 26, 2024
Calcutta High Court: Pre-emptor's Right Affirmed Based on Contiguous Ownership Under Section 8 of West Bengal Land Reforms Act; Limitation and Vesting Claims Rejected as Unsupported
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Pre-emptor’s Right Affirmed Based on Contiguous Ownership Under Section 8 of West Bengal Land Reforms Act; Limitation and Vesting Claims Rejected as Unsupported

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed a revision application challenging the trial and appellate courts' orders, which upheld a pre-emption application filed under Section 8 of the West Bengal…
Posted by Rawlaw November 26, 2024
Calcutta High Court: Petition Challenging M.R. Food Grain Distributorship Dismissed as Petitioner Provided False Details About Godown; Court Reiterates "Fraud Unravels Everything" and Upholds Valid Appointment of Respondent
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Petition Challenging M.R. Food Grain Distributorship Dismissed as Petitioner Provided False Details About Godown; Court Reiterates “Fraud Unravels Everything” and Upholds Valid Appointment of Respondent

Court's Decision The Calcutta High Court rejected the petitioner’s plea to cancel the M.R. distributorship license granted to another candidate (respondent no. 10). The court found that the petitioner was…
Posted by Rawlaw November 26, 2024
Calcutta High Court: "Ambiguous Admissions Cannot Serve as a Basis for Judgment Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC"; Dismisses Revision Application in ₹16 Lakh Dispute Requiring Evidence
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: “Ambiguous Admissions Cannot Serve as a Basis for Judgment Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC”; Dismisses Revision Application in ₹16 Lakh Dispute Requiring Evidence

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed the civil revision application (C.O. 504 of 2022) challenging the trial court’s order, which rejected the plaintiff’s request for a judgment on admission…
Posted by Rawlaw November 26, 2024
Calcutta High Court Grants Probate of Holograph Will Despite Alleged Suspicious Circumstances: "Genuine Intention of the Testator Is Paramount in Assessing the Validity of a Will''
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Grants Probate of Holograph Will Despite Alleged Suspicious Circumstances: “Genuine Intention of the Testator Is Paramount in Assessing the Validity of a Will”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court reversed the trial court's decision rejecting the probate application for a holograph Will dated December 31, 1986, executed by the testator, Sudhir Chandra Konar.…
Posted by Rawlaw November 26, 2024

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 8 9 10

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
  • Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top