Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Civil Procedure Code

Home - Civil Procedure Code

Bombay High Court: “Lawsuits Cannot Be Used to Stall Redevelopment — Suit Filed After 20 Years to Challenge Father’s Alienation of Property Is Hopelessly Time-Barred”
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Lawsuits Cannot Be Used to Stall Redevelopment — Suit Filed After 20 Years to Challenge Father’s Alienation of Property Is Hopelessly Time-Barred”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, per Justice Sandeep V. Marne, dismissed a civil suit challenging a 2004 declaration and related property deeds on the ground of limitation, holding that…
Posted by Rawlaw November 6, 2025
Andhra Pradesh High Court Vacates Ex-Parte Attachment in Maritime Arbitration: “Attachment Cannot Convert an Unsecured Claim into a Secured Debt” Section 9 cannot be used to freeze assets for unadjudicated demurrage claims.
Posted inNews

Andhra Pradesh High Court Vacates Ex-Parte Attachment in Maritime Arbitration: “Attachment Cannot Convert an Unsecured Claim into a Secured Debt” Section 9 cannot be used to freeze assets for unadjudicated demurrage claims.

Court’s Decision The Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, presided over by Justice Challa Gunaranjan, dismissed an application filed by a Hong Kong-based shipping company under Section 9 of the…
Posted by Rawlaw October 19, 2025
Delhi-High-Court-Grants-Complete-Stay-on-Execution-of-Rs-336-Crore-Damages-Decree-Against-Amazon-Award-of-Enhanced-Damages-Without-Pleadings-Violates-Natural-Justice
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Grants Complete Stay on Execution of Rs 336 Crore Damages Decree Against Amazon: “Award of Enhanced Damages Without Pleadings Violates Natural Justice”

Court's Decision The Delhi High Court stayed the execution of a decree awarding INR 336,02,87,000 (approximately 336 crores) in damages and over INR 3.23 crores in costs against Amazon Technologies…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
Karnataka-High-Court-Holds-Court-Fee-on-Amended-Relief-Must-Be-Paid-as-per-Market-Value-on-Date-of-Original-Suit-Amendment-Relates-Back-Fresh-Valuation-on-Amendment-Date-is-Legally-Unsustainable
Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court Holds Court Fee on Amended Relief Must Be Paid as per Market Value on Date of Original Suit: “Amendment Relates Back, Fresh Valuation on Amendment Date is Legally Unsustainable”

Court’s Decision The Karnataka High Court, in a judgment dated 2 June 2025, allowed the writ petition and quashed the Trial Court’s order that directed the plaintiff to value the…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top