Delhi High Court: Does an Application for Substitution of Legal Heirs, Filed Beyond the Limitation Period, Automatically Lead to Abatement of the Case? Delhi High Court Rules: “Procedural Rules Must Not Prevent Substantial Justice Unless Delay Is Caused by Gross Negligence”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: Does an Application for Substitution of Legal Heirs, Filed Beyond the Limitation Period, Automatically Lead to Abatement of the Case? Delhi High Court Rules: “Procedural Rules Must Not Prevent Substantial Justice Unless Delay Is Caused by Gross Negligence”

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition challenging the orders of the Rent Controller and the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) that allowed the substitution of legal…
December 5, 2024
UPLOAD PENDING - Delhi High Court: Can a Magistrate or Special Court Question an FIR's Validity or Quash It During an Investigation? Affirms That Magistrates and Special Courts Are Limited to Ensuring Procedural Fairness and Must Not Interfere with FIR Validity
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: Can a Magistrate or Special Court Question an FIR’s Validity or Quash It During an Investigation? Affirms That Magistrates and Special Courts Are Limited to Ensuring Procedural Fairness and Must Not Interfere with FIR Validity

Court’s Decision The High Court emphasized the following principles: Investigative Authority: Magistrates and Special Courts do not have the authority to interfere with ongoing investigations or question the validity of…
December 4, 2024
Delhi High Court: Documents Like General Power of Attorney (GPA), Sale Agreement, and Will Do Not Transfer Ownership of Immovable Property, Only Create Limited Rights Under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; Clarifies Narrow Scope of Second Appeals Under Section 100 CPC
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: Documents Like General Power of Attorney (GPA), Sale Agreement, and Will Do Not Transfer Ownership of Immovable Property, Only Create Limited Rights Under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; Clarifies Narrow Scope of Second Appeals Under Section 100 CPC

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a second appeal filed by the appellants, who claimed ownership of the suit property based on documents such as General Power of Attorney…
December 4, 2024
Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reclassification of Handicraft Exports: "MEIS Benefits Were Not Available for Goods Incorrectly Classified Under ITC(HS); Misclassification Violates Customs Act Sections 28 and 28AAA"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reclassification of Handicraft Exports: “MEIS Benefits Were Not Available for Goods Incorrectly Classified Under ITC(HS); Misclassification Violates Customs Act Sections 28 and 28AAA”

Court's Decision The Delhi High Court rejected the petitions and affirmed the reclassification of exported goods by the Customs Department under CTH 6802, which invalidated the petitioners' claim for MEIS…
November 30, 2024