Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

employee

Home - employee

biada
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Directs BIADA to Pay 70% Back Wages to Wrongfully Retired Employee: “An Employer Cannot Take Advantage of Its Own Wrong”

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court, presided by Justice Anil Kumar Sinha, allowed the writ petition filed by an employee of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA), setting aside…
Posted by Rawlaw October 17, 2025
pay rise
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Directs Consideration of Teachers’ Claim for Trained Pay Scale: “Employees Cannot Suffer for Administrative Lapses”

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court, through Justice Harish Kumar, disposed of a writ petition filed by a group of teachers seeking grant of the trained pay scale after completion…
Posted by Rawlaw October 12, 2025
canara bank
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: “Tribunal and High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence; once enquiry held fair, interference with penalty is impermissible” – Compulsory retirement of Canara Bank employee upheld

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Canara Bank, setting aside the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and the judgment of the Karnataka High Court…
Posted by Rawlaw September 10, 2025
mistakes
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Reversion Orders, Holds Employees Cannot Be Penalized for Employer’s Mistake in Granting Exemption from Departmental Exam

“It would be unjust, unreasonable and harsh to conclude that the Petitioners should be penalized for the default/mistake by MJP.” — Bombay High Court Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top