Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

” Highlights Consent in Adult Relationships and Completeness of Investigation

Home - " Highlights Consent in Adult Relationships and Completeness of Investigation

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Alleged False Promise of Marriage Case: "Inducement or Deception Can Only Be Determined After Trial," Highlights Consent in Adult Relationships and Completeness of Investigation
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Alleged False Promise of Marriage Case: “Inducement or Deception Can Only Be Determined After Trial,” Highlights Consent in Adult Relationships and Completeness of Investigation

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court, in its judgment dated February 12, 2025, granted regular bail to the accused in a case filed under Sections 376 (rape) and 313 (causing…
Posted by Rawlaw February 12, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court Allows Foreign Travel Despite Alleged ₹1626.74 Crore Bank Fraud, Suspends LOCs issued by CBI and ED — “Right to Travel Integral to Article 21; Vague Apprehensions Cannot Override Personal Liberty”
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash Sugar Mill Licence – “Challenge to Continuation of Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum (IEM) for Shivneri Sugars Ltd. Unfounded; No Material to Prove Government’s Recognition of Existing Sugar Factory Was Arbitrary or Illegal”
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses Applications for De-Freezing of Assets in Rs. 1,260 Crore Religare Finvest Limited fraud case – “Mere invocation of educational need, without presenting a concrete, detailed, and credible plan cannot justify the sweeping relief they seek”
  • Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in NDPS Case Involving Commercial Quantity of Poppy Straw—”Section 37 NDPS Act Rigorously Applies; Twin Conditions Not Satisfied”
  • Delhi High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing Auction of Defaulter’s Property — “DRT, by repeatedly extending time and setting aside an auction where no illegality was established, had erred in law; DRT’s final relief setting aside a lawfully conducted auction was an overreach.”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top