Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Holds That Revision Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Orders: “Order does not finally decide the lis and is not amenable to revision”

Home - Holds That Revision Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Orders: “Order does not finally decide the lis and is not amenable to revision”

Delhi High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Petition Under Section 115 CPC, Holds That Revision Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Orders: “Order does not finally decide the lis and is not amenable to revision”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Petition Under Section 115 CPC, Holds That Revision Not Maintainable Against Interlocutory Orders: “Order does not finally decide the lis and is not amenable to revision”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC as withdrawn, holding that the impugned order—being interlocutory in nature—was not amenable to challenge. The…
Posted by Rawlaw May 19, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top