Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Insufficient Evidence from Co-Accused Statements

Home - Insufficient Evidence from Co-Accused Statements

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case: Emphasizes Inadmissibility of Section 67 Confessions, Insufficient Evidence from Co-Accused Statements, and Lack of Corroboration for CDRs and WhatsApp Messages
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case: Emphasizes Inadmissibility of Section 67 Confessions, Insufficient Evidence from Co-Accused Statements, and Lack of Corroboration for CDRs and WhatsApp Messages

Court's Decision The Bombay High Court allowed the bail applications of Accused Nos. 2 and 4 under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The decision was primarily…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025

Recent News

  • Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty and 15-Year Separation — “Long Separation Without Intent to Resume Cohabitation Is Cruelty in Itself”
  • Kerala High Court Sets Aside Lok Adalat Award Denying Insurance Claim—“Policy Valid from Date of Premium Payment, Not Later Issuance”
  • Kerala High Court Upholds Conviction in Abetment of Suicide Case—“Dying Declaration of Victim Inspires Confidence; Accused’s Acts Left Her With No Other Option”
  • Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Trademark Registration Orders in ‘Dunlop’ Mark Dispute—“A Pretence of Reasons Is Not a Valid Decision-Making Process”: Court Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration
  • Calcutta High Court: Oral Dedication Must Be Proved by Evidence—“No Waqf Without Evidence of Dedication”; Tribunal Order Partly Set Aside; Matter Remitted for Fresh Inquiry
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top