Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

interim relief

Home » interim relief
COOPERATIVE DISPUTE
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court upholds appellate refusal of interim relief in cooperative dispute — ‘No declaration sought against general body resolution; courts cannot grant consequential relief without removing the cloud on rights’

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 challenging the Cooperative Appellate Court’s order which had set aside interim relief earlier granted by…
Posted by Rawlaw December 7, 2025
SEBI
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court declines interim relief against SEBI forensic audit directions — ‘Jurisdiction objections must await final adjudication’

1. Court’s decision The Bombay High Court refused to grant ad-interim protection to the petitioners challenging SEBI’s communications directing their company and its directors to undergo a forensic audit. The…
Posted by Rawlaw December 6, 2025
karanja terminal
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Karanja Terminal and Logistics Pvt. Ltd.: “No Concluded Contract Without Approval of All Consortium Lenders”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court refused to grant interim relief to the petitioner company challenging the annulment of its One-Time Settlement (OTS) proposal by a consortium of banks led…
Posted by Rawlaw October 9, 2025
Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act
Posted inNews

Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court refused to adjudicate on disputed factual issues concerning reversal of input tax credit (ITC) under the CGST/BGST Act, 2017, and permitted the petitioner to…
Posted by Rawlaw August 23, 2025
property sale dispute
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Oberoi Realty in Disputed Apartment Sale: “Section 9 cannot be invoked to bypass established legal obligations”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court rejected Oberoi Realty Limited’s petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim measures to restrain purchasers from dealing with…
Posted by Rawlaw July 25, 2025
limited liability
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Personal Disclosure and Deposit Directions Against Promoter in Arbitration, Holding Limited Liability of One Person Company Bars Interim Relief Against Sole Shareholder Absent Contractual Basis

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court partially allowed the appeals under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by setting aside the arbitral tribunal’s direction requiring the sole…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
refused interim relief
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Developer Seeking Specific Performance of Terminated Development Agreement: “Petitioner Has No Substantive Right to Continue Construction After Termination”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court rejected a developer’s interim application seeking specific performance and status quo protection in a suit arising from the termination of a development agreement. The…
Posted by Rawlaw June 25, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top