Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

interim relief

Home - interim relief

karanja terminal
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Karanja Terminal and Logistics Pvt. Ltd.: “No Concluded Contract Without Approval of All Consortium Lenders”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court refused to grant interim relief to the petitioner company challenging the annulment of its One-Time Settlement (OTS) proposal by a consortium of banks led…
Posted by Rawlaw October 9, 2025
Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act
Posted inNews

Patna High Court: “Disputed Questions of Fact Must Be Decided by Tribunal, Not Writ Court” — Writ Petition Withdrawn with Liberty, Interim Relief Directed Under Section 112 CGST/BGST Act

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court refused to adjudicate on disputed factual issues concerning reversal of input tax credit (ITC) under the CGST/BGST Act, 2017, and permitted the petitioner to…
Posted by Rawlaw August 23, 2025
property sale dispute
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Oberoi Realty in Disputed Apartment Sale: “Section 9 cannot be invoked to bypass established legal obligations”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court rejected Oberoi Realty Limited’s petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim measures to restrain purchasers from dealing with…
Posted by Rawlaw July 25, 2025
limited liability
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Personal Disclosure and Deposit Directions Against Promoter in Arbitration, Holding Limited Liability of One Person Company Bars Interim Relief Against Sole Shareholder Absent Contractual Basis

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court partially allowed the appeals under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by setting aside the arbitral tribunal’s direction requiring the sole…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
refused interim relief
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Developer Seeking Specific Performance of Terminated Development Agreement: “Petitioner Has No Substantive Right to Continue Construction After Termination”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court rejected a developer’s interim application seeking specific performance and status quo protection in a suit arising from the termination of a development agreement. The…
Posted by Rawlaw June 25, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top