Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Jail is the Exception”

Home - Jail is the Exception"

Bombay High Court Grants Bail Under Section 436-A CrPC: "Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Without Trial Violates Article 21, Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Bail Under Section 436-A CrPC: “Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Without Trial Violates Article 21, Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicants under Section 436-A of the CrPC, which provides for release of undertrial prisoners who have served half of the…
Posted by Rawlaw February 19, 2025
Bombay High Court Grants Bail Under Section 436-A Cr.P.C.: "Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention of Over 4 Years in PMLA Case Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial; Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Bail Under Section 436-A Cr.P.C.: “Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention of Over 4 Years in PMLA Case Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial; Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception”

Court's Decision The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicants under Section 436-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), highlighting their right to personal liberty under Article…
Posted by Rawlaw February 12, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top