Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Order VII Rule 11

Home » Order VII Rule 11
Bombay High Court: “Lawsuits Cannot Be Used to Stall Redevelopment — Suit Filed After 20 Years to Challenge Father’s Alienation of Property Is Hopelessly Time-Barred”
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Lawsuits Cannot Be Used to Stall Redevelopment — Suit Filed After 20 Years to Challenge Father’s Alienation of Property Is Hopelessly Time-Barred”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, per Justice Sandeep V. Marne, dismissed a civil suit challenging a 2004 declaration and related property deeds on the ground of limitation, holding that…
Posted by Rawlaw November 6, 2025
Bombay High Court: Suits to Cancel Instruments on Grounds of Fraud Commence from the Date Fraud Becomes Known, Not from Execution of the Document; Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 Not Justified When Fraud and Misrepresentation Are Pleaded
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: Suits to Cancel Instruments on Grounds of Fraud Commence from the Date Fraud Becomes Known, Not from Execution of the Document; Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 Not Justified When Fraud and Misrepresentation Are Pleaded

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the lower appellate court’s order which had set aside the rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.…
Posted by Rawlaw October 7, 2025
minor coparcener
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Restores Minor Coparceners’ HUF Property Suit, Says “Threshold Dismissal on Abuse of Process Must Follow Order VII Rule 11 Parameters”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court set aside the order of a Single Judge who had dismissed a declaratory suit filed by minors through their natural guardian, on the ground…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court holds admitted documents dispense with proof — “Port Trust liable to refund illegal auction proceeds, ownership established by admissions”
  • Bombay High Court refuses to quash deemed conveyance despite fraud and title objections — “MOFA authority’s role is summary, civil court alone can decide ownership”
  • Bombay High Court upholds SIDBI pension cut-off date — “Denial of retrospective pension not arbitrary, policy choice backed by Supreme Court precedent”
  • Bombay High Court orders grant of deemed conveyance under MOFA — “Promoter’s delay defeated, statutory agreements prevail over disputed consents”
  • Delhi High Court denies residence order under Domestic Violence Act — “Voluntary relocation defeats claim to re-enter past shared household”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top