Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Penalty Notices Must Specify Charge—Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars—Failure Violates Natural Justice and Renders Penalties Unenforceable”

Home - "Penalty Notices Must Specify Charge—Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars—Failure Violates Natural Justice and Renders Penalties Unenforceable"

Delhi High Court Rejects Income Tax Department’s Appeal: "Penalty Notices Must Specify Charge—Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars—Failure Violates Natural Justice and Renders Penalties Unenforceable"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rejects Income Tax Department’s Appeal: “Penalty Notices Must Specify Charge—Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars—Failure Violates Natural Justice and Renders Penalties Unenforceable”

Court's Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the ITAT's ruling that the penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were invalid due to…
Posted by Rawlaw November 30, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court holds Registrar of Firms has no power to cancel registration under Partnership Act — “Section 64 permits only rectification, not review or annulment” — cancellation order set aside
  • Supreme Court of India upholds Committee of Creditors’ commercial wisdom in SKS Power insolvency — “Clarifications are not modifications; courts cannot re-evaluate bids” — appeals by unsuccessful resolution applicants dismissed
  • Delhi High Court sets aside Registrar’s order condoning 2-year delay in trademark opposition — “Rule 45 timelines are strict and non-extendable; deemed abandonment is automatic” — IBM’s TIVOLI mark opposition revived order quashed
  • Delhi High Court refuses to condone 1,000-day delay in commercial appeal — “Commercial Courts Act mandates strict timelines; negligence of counsel no sufficient cause”; ex-parte money decree upheld
  • Supreme Court of India protects promotions granted under its earlier judgment — “High Court could not revisit or dilute finality of Supreme Court order”; relief confined to appellants
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top