News Delhi High Court upholds arbitral award in SAIL–Primetals dispute — “No contractual clause permits deduction for shortfall in minimum guaranteed CENVAT credit”, Section 34 challenge dismissed RawlawFebruary 24, 20266 min read
News Bombay High Court: Multi-State co-operative bank can invoke Section 84 arbitration despite SARFAESI action — RDB Act itself preserves option; Section 34 challenge dismissed RawlawFebruary 14, 20266 min read
News Delhi High Court upholds arbitral award against National Highways Authority — no patent illegality in toll fee, COD delay and free pass compensation; Section 34 challenge dismissed RawlawJanuary 27, 20266 min read
News Delhi High Court condones 2.5-year delay in NHPC’s arbitration challenge — bona fide pursuit before wrong forum protected under Section 14; Section 34 petition held within limitation RawlawJanuary 27, 20266 min read
News Delhi High Court refuses to set aside arbitral award in hospital security contract dispute — arbitrator’s factual findings upheld, public authority can’t withhold dues after availing services; Section 34 petition dismissed RawlawJanuary 26, 20266 min read
News Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with arbitral award in hospital security services dispute — courts can’t re-appreciate evidence under Section 34; government can’t withhold dues after availing services RawlawJanuary 26, 20266 min read
News Delhi High Court: Section 34 challenge without arbitral award is “non-est” — “Some time is sought” is not judicial liberty; appeal dismissed and costs upheld RawlawJanuary 4, 20267 min read
News Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable” RawlawDecember 28, 20256 min read
News Madras High Court holds that “a guarantor cannot approbate and reprobate” — section 34 challenge dismissed and arbitral award enforcing guarantee deed upheld RawlawDecember 12, 20255 min read
News Bombay High Court “section 34 is not an appellate forum to substitute one plausible commercial view with another” — arbitral award on ‘built up area wall to wall’ upheld, developer’s challenge dismissed RawlawDecember 11, 20256 min read
