Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

source

Home - source

Bombay High Court: “Proof of source of funds is not mandatory once issuance of cheque is admitted; presumption under Section 139 NI Act firmly applies” – Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Proof of source of funds is not mandatory once issuance of cheque is admitted; presumption under Section 139 NI Act firmly applies” – Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the accused challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court upheld the…
Posted by Rawlaw October 2, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Courts cannot derail elections under Article 243-O; objections to ward formation must be raised timely” – Petitions challenging delimitation of Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti wards dismissed
  • Bombay High Court: “Finality under Section 16(5) of Telegraph Act bars first appeals; remedy lies under Articles 226/227” – Appeals by farmers returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC
  • Bombay High Court: “Fraud vitiates everything; Transferable Development Rights transactions must strictly comply with law” – Interim reliefs in TDR dispute denied
  • Bombay High Court: “Judicial review is not an appeal; departmental findings cannot be reappreciated if based on some evidence” – Dismissal of police constable upheld
  • Bombay High Court: “Election of a democratically elected candidate cannot be set aside on inferential basis” – Election petition dismissed for lack of material particulars under Representation of the People Act
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top