Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Specific Justification for Continued Detention is Mandatory”

Home - “Specific Justification for Continued Detention is Mandatory”

Delhi High Court Rejects State’s Plea for Extension of Investigation Time Under Section 43D(2) of UAPA: “Specific Justification for Continued Detention is Mandatory”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rejects State’s Plea for Extension of Investigation Time Under Section 43D(2) of UAPA: “Specific Justification for Continued Detention is Mandatory”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s rejection of the State's application seeking an extension of the investigation period beyond the statutory 90 days under Section 43D(2)…
Posted by Rawlaw December 17, 2024

Recent News

  • Madras High Court: Sale agreement used as loan security cannot justify specific performance — “Property owner directed to repay ₹20 lakh with interest”
  • Madras High Court: Specific performance denied where buyer failed to prove readiness and willingness — “Seller ordered to refund ₹7 lakh advance”
  • Madras High Court: Dubbing rights do not include satellite broadcast rights— “Appeals over Telugu version of film Roja dismissed”
  • Madras High Court: Police must ensure non-discriminatory temple worship during festival — “Petition for protection disposed with directions”
  • Madras High Court: Petition seeking action against – “Illegal sand quarrying withdrawn, writ dismissed”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top