Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence”

Home - Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence"

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Condonation of 565-Day Delay in Filing Appeal: “Educated Litigants Must Diligently Track Their Cases, Sufficient Cause Requires Vigilance and Diligence”

Court's Decision: The Delhi High Court refused to condone a delay of 565 days in filing an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The court…

Posted by

Rawlaw February 15, 2025

Recent News

Delhi High Court holds AIIMS cannot deny super-speciality admission despite 1095-day tenure — “Post-MD senior residency must be counted”; appeal dismissed on last date of admission
Supreme Court of India clarifies surety liability under contract law — “Discharge under Section 133 is only for transactions after variance”; guarantors liable up to sanctioned limit
Delhi High Court allows Britannia to amend plaint and implead trademark proprietor — “Perjury requires deliberate falsehood, not inadvertent error”; criminal plea dismissed
Delhi High Court refuses injunction against ‘Baby Forest’ — “Forest Essentials is a composite mark; no monopoly over ‘forest’”; appeal dismissed
Delhi High Court grants injunction to GlaxoSmithKline against ‘FEXIT’ marks — “Phonetic similarity in medicines demands stricter scrutiny”; Zee Laboratories restrained

Scroll to Top