Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions – Applying the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens to Prevent Forum Shopping and Ensure Judicial Efficiency

Home - Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions – Applying the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens to Prevent Forum Shopping and Ensure Judicial Efficiency

Delhi High Court Judgment: Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions – Applying the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens to Prevent Forum Shopping and Ensure Judicial Efficiency
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Judgment: Territorial Jurisdiction in Writ Petitions – Applying the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens to Prevent Forum Shopping and Ensure Judicial Efficiency

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the petitioner’s disqualification from employment in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). The Court ruled that it lacked territorial…
Posted by Rawlaw March 3, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court holds Registrar of Firms has no power to cancel registration under Partnership Act — “Section 64 permits only rectification, not review or annulment” — cancellation order set aside
  • Supreme Court of India upholds Committee of Creditors’ commercial wisdom in SKS Power insolvency — “Clarifications are not modifications; courts cannot re-evaluate bids” — appeals by unsuccessful resolution applicants dismissed
  • Delhi High Court sets aside Registrar’s order condoning 2-year delay in trademark opposition — “Rule 45 timelines are strict and non-extendable; deemed abandonment is automatic” — IBM’s TIVOLI mark opposition revived order quashed
  • Delhi High Court refuses to condone 1,000-day delay in commercial appeal — “Commercial Courts Act mandates strict timelines; negligence of counsel no sufficient cause”; ex-parte money decree upheld
  • Supreme Court of India protects promotions granted under its earlier judgment — “High Court could not revisit or dilute finality of Supreme Court order”; relief confined to appellants
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top