Bombay High Court “marks are remembered by general impression, not photographic recollection” — interim injunction granted restraining deceptive imitation of trade dress, labels and composite trademarks in hair oil products
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court “marks are remembered by general impression, not photographic recollection” — interim injunction granted restraining deceptive imitation of trade dress, labels and composite trademarks in hair oil products

Court's decision The Bombay High Court granted comprehensive interim injunctive relief restraining the Respondents from infringing registered trademarks, copyright, and trade dress associated with the Petitioner’s hair oil products. The…
December 11, 2025
Bombay High Court says “jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent or convenience” — Court holds that matters arising from Kolhapur district must be heard before the Kolhapur Bench under Rule 3A and declines to entertain Article 227 petition on territorial grounds
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court says “jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent or convenience” — Court holds that matters arising from Kolhapur district must be heard before the Kolhapur Bench under Rule 3A and declines to entertain Article 227 petition on territorial grounds

Court's decision The Bombay High Court ruled that the present petition under Article 227 was not maintainable before the principal seat because the controversy arose entirely within Kolhapur district, and…
December 10, 2025
Bombay High Court says “the authority cannot ignore the statutory mandate of Section 154B-13” — Court directs recognition of heir’s claim in co-operative society dispute and upholds nominee’s limited status under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court says “the authority cannot ignore the statutory mandate of Section 154B-13” — Court directs recognition of heir’s claim in co-operative society dispute and upholds nominee’s limited status under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act

Court's decision The Bombay High Court held that the Respondent authorities acted contrary to law by failing to decide the Petitioner society’s application under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative…
December 10, 2025