Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

News

Home » News » Page 6
Bombay High Court holds teacher transferred from unaided to aided post is entitled to full salary grant—“Partial grant policy applies only to fresh appointments, not transfers”; approval order modified
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds teacher transferred from unaided to aided post is entitled to full salary grant—“Partial grant policy applies only to fresh appointments, not transfers”; approval order modified

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Kolhapur Bench) allowed a writ petition filed by an Assistant Teacher and quashed the Deputy Director of Education’s order granting only staggered, partial salary…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
Court restores mutation based on decree.
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court restores mutation based on registered consent decree—“Revenue authorities cannot sit in appeal over civil court decree or adjudicate title”; mutation entry reinstated

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) allowed a writ petition and quashed concurrent orders passed by revenue authorities which had deleted a mutation entry effected in…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
factory
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds trader storing medicines in refrigerator is not a ‘factory’ under ESI Act—“Mere storage is not manufacturing process; cold storage distinct from refrigerator”; ESI demand set aside

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court allowed a first appeal under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, and set aside the ESI Court’s finding that a medicine distributor storing drugs…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
final adjudication
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court quashes stamp duty demand on development agreement—“Final adjudication cannot be reopened beyond limitation; Section 33A power lies only with registering officer”; recovery order set aside

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by a real estate developer and quashed an order demanding deficit stamp duty by treating a development agreement…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
Bombay High Court grants injunction in specific performance suit over CIDCO plot—“receipt of ₹3.12 crore and permitted third-party rights create strong prima facie equity”; developers restrained despite later tripartite agreement
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court grants injunction in specific performance suit over CIDCO plot—“receipt of ₹3.12 crore and permitted third-party rights create strong prima facie equity”; developers restrained despite later tripartite agreement

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court allowed an Appeal from Order and set aside the trial court’s refusal to grant interim injunction in a suit for specific performance concerning a…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
arbitration
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds Mumbai as seat of arbitration in lender–borrower dispute—“Arbitration ‘to be held’ indicates seat, not mere venue; SARFAESI action no bar”; arbitrator appointed, interim protection granted

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) allowed a lender’s application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
mortgagor
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court upholds mandatory pre-deposit under SARFAESI for mortgagor appealing procedural orders—“Section 18 applies to any order; mortgagor falls within borrower”; writ petition dismissed

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal which directed a real estate developer to deposit ₹125 crores as…
Posted by Rawlaw February 9, 2026
bank mortgage
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds civil court can examine sale agreement rescission despite bank mortgage—“Tribunal jurisdiction does not extend to pre-mortgage contractual disputes”; revision dismissed

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court refused to interfere with an order declining rejection of a civil suit at the threshold, holding that a suit seeking rescission of a sale…
Posted by Rawlaw February 8, 2026
recovery suit
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court holds pending salary recovery suit can continue after liquidation—“Section 33(5) bars only fresh suits, not ongoing proceedings”; liquidator directed to be impleaded

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court set aside an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which had refused to implead the Official Liquidator in a pending salary recovery suit…
Posted by Rawlaw February 8, 2026
school staff accused
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court refuses to discharge school staff accused in mid-day meal rice diversion case—“Plea of alibi cannot be examined at discharge stage”; writ petition dismissed

Court’s decision The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) declined to interfere with concurrent orders of the trial court and the revisional court rejecting discharge applications filed by two school employees…
Posted by Rawlaw February 8, 2026

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 355 Next page

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court: Prosecutor recruitment requires strict compliance with experience criteria — “No relaxation beyond advertisement terms; writ petition dismissed”
  • Supreme Court of India: Absconding accused cannot claim anticipatory bail on co-accused’s acquittal — “Granting pre-arrest relief after six years on the run is perverse; High Court order set aside”
  • Bombay High Court: Withdrawal of additional increments for LSGD/LGS diplomas without notice of change prima facie illegal — “Long-standing concession attracts Section 9-A; interim stay upheld”
  • Supreme Court of India: Income Tax Department cannot deny regularization to similarly placed casual workers — “Misapplication of Umadevi corrected; services ordered regularized from 01 July 2006”
  • Delhi High Court: Arbitral award granting 484-day extension in railway tunnel project upheld — “Critical path analysis plausible; no patent illegality in setting aside liquidated damages”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top