Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Bars Recovery of Excess Payments from Retired Railway Employee: “Recovery from Retired Employees Without Undertakings Violates Rafiq Masih Principles and Causes Injustice”

Home » Bars Recovery of Excess Payments from Retired Railway Employee: "Recovery from Retired Employees Without Undertakings Violates Rafiq Masih Principles and Causes Injustice"
Delhi High Court Bars Recovery of Excess Payments from Retired Railway Employee: "Recovery from Retired Employees Without Undertakings Violates Rafiq Masih Principles and Causes Injustice"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Bars Recovery of Excess Payments from Retired Railway Employee: “Recovery from Retired Employees Without Undertakings Violates Rafiq Masih Principles and Causes Injustice”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Union of India, which sought to challenge the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The…
Posted by Rawlaw January 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court holds civil court can examine sale agreement rescission despite bank mortgage—“Tribunal jurisdiction does not extend to pre-mortgage contractual disputes”; revision dismissed
  • Bombay High Court holds pending salary recovery suit can continue after liquidation—“Section 33(5) bars only fresh suits, not ongoing proceedings”; liquidator directed to be impleaded
  • Bombay High Court refuses to discharge school staff accused in mid-day meal rice diversion case—“Plea of alibi cannot be examined at discharge stage”; writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court quashes Legal Metrology prosecution against company director—“No vicarious liability without specific averments or arraigning company”; criminal case set aside
  • Bombay High Court quashes preventive detention under MPDA Act—“Non-consideration of bail orders and absence of Arms Act notification vitiates subjective satisfaction”; detenu ordered to be released
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top