Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

court

Home - court - Page 2

landlord
Posted inNews

Gujarat High Court: “Once title is admitted, possession must follow title” – Court holds tenant cannot deny ownership of landlord in writ jurisdiction

Court’s Decision The Gujarat High Court dismissed the petition filed by the tenant challenging the orders of the revenue authorities and the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal. The Court upheld that once…
Posted by Rawlaw August 21, 2025
land acquisition
Posted inNews

Gujarat High Court: “Government Cannot Act Arbitrarily in Land Acquisition Matters” — Court Strikes Down Acquisition Due to Lack of Justifiable Public Purpose

Court’s Decision The High Court quashed the acquisition proceedings, holding that the State failed to establish a justifiable public purpose and acted in violation of constitutional guarantees under Article 300A.…
Posted by Rawlaw August 21, 2025
Calcutta High Court Affirms Non-Interference in Industrial Tribunal’s Award — “Court Will Not Substitute Its Own View Unless Findings Are Perverse”
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Affirms Non-Interference in Industrial Tribunal’s Award — “Court Will Not Substitute Its Own View Unless Findings Are Perverse”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal award in a service dispute. The Court reiterated that it will not reappreciate evidence or substitute…
Posted by Rawlaw August 16, 2025
PREVENTIVE DETENTION
Posted inNews

Madras High Court on Preventive Detention — “Court Cannot Remain a Mute Spectator When Detention Is Unsupported by Cogent Material”

Court’s Decision The Madras High Court quashed the preventive detention order issued under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders,…
Posted by Rawlaw August 14, 2025
high court of kerala
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court: “Buyer Cannot Claim Charge in Absence of Completed Assignment”—Court Sets Aside Attachment Order, Rules No Charge Exists Without Privity or Assignable Right

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court, through Justice M.A. Abdul Hakhim, allowed a first appeal and set aside the trial court’s order that had granted an attachment before judgment over…
Posted by Rawlaw July 25, 2025
no proof
Posted inNews

Orissa High Court Dismisses Recall Plea Against Quashing of Criminal Proceedings, Finds No Proof of Fraud Practised Upon the Court

“Fraud must not only be alleged but proved to satisfaction to have been practiced”—Orissa High Court refuses to recall quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC in absence of concrete…
Posted by Rawlaw July 16, 2025
penal challenges
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects Arbitration in Kotak-Samruddhi Dispute: “Recovery Disputes Alone Are Covered; Penal Interest Challenges Must Go to Court”

Name of the Judgment: Samruddhi Industries Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed an application under Section 11 of the…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 2

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top