Delhi High Court Quashes Auction Sale Over Defective Title, Orders Bank to Refund ₹9.93 Lakh with Interest, Pay ₹5 Lakh Compensation, and Initiate Corrective Measures, Emphasizing Accountability and Consumer Protection in Property Auctions

Delhi High Court Quashes Auction Sale Over Defective Title, Orders Bank to Refund ₹9.93 Lakh with Interest, Pay ₹5 Lakh Compensation, and Initiate Corrective Measures, Emphasizing Accountability and Consumer Protection in Property Auctions

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, quashing the sale certificate issued to the petitioner. It ordered the respondent bank to:…
Delhi High Court Holds That Rejection of Late Counter-Claim by Sole Arbitrator Is a Procedural Decision Not Open to Appeal Under Section 37(2)(a), Reaffirms Arbitrator's Authority to Enforce Timelines and Maintain Efficiency in Arbitration ProceedingsDelhi High Court Holds That Rejection of Late Counter-Claim by Sole Arbitrator Is a Procedural Decision Not Open to Appeal Under Section 37(2)(a), Reaffirms Arbitrator's Authority to Enforce Timelines and Maintain Efficiency in Arbitration Proceedings

Delhi High Court Holds That Rejection of Late Counter-Claim by Sole Arbitrator Is a Procedural Decision Not Open to Appeal Under Section 37(2)(a), Reaffirms Arbitrator’s Authority to Enforce Timelines and Maintain Efficiency in Arbitration Proceedings

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appeal challenged the Sole Arbitrator’s procedural decision rejecting a…