Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court

Home - Delhi High Court - Page 51

Delhi High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Despite Settlement Claim — "The de facto Complainant Opposed Quashing, Citing Non-Compliance of Settlement Terms by Petitioners"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Despite Settlement Claim — “The de facto Complainant Opposed Quashing, Citing Non-Compliance of Settlement Terms by Petitioners”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR No.128/2013 registered at Police Station Vasant Vihar for offences under Sections 420, 471, 467, 468, 120B, and…
Posted by Rawlaw June 2, 2025
Delhi High Court Grants Probate of Will to Wife, Rejects Objector's Claims — “A Mere Deviation in Age or Shares Cannot Invalidate Will When Attestation and Execution Are Proved”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Grants Probate of Will to Wife, Rejects Objector’s Claims — “A Mere Deviation in Age or Shares Cannot Invalidate Will When Attestation and Execution Are Proved”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court, in Test Case No. 54/2014, granted probate of the Will dated 11.12.2004 of Late D.K. Jain, rejecting the objections raised by his daughter (Legal…
Posted by Rawlaw June 2, 2025
Delhi High Court Acquits Convict for Lack of Common Intention in Murder Case — “Mere Presence at the Scene, Absent Overt Acts or Shared Motive, Cannot Ground Criminal Liability Under Section 34 IPC”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Acquits Convict for Lack of Common Intention in Murder Case — “Mere Presence at the Scene, Absent Overt Acts or Shared Motive, Cannot Ground Criminal Liability Under Section 34 IPC”

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court partly allowed CRL.A. 434/2024 filed by the convict (A-4/Choti) and dismissed CRL.A. 720/2024 filed by the complainant (father of the deceased). The Court acquitted…
Posted by Rawlaw June 2, 2025
Delhi High Court Dismisses Partition Suit After Grant of Probate — "Testamentary Jurisdiction Prevails Over Civil Claims, Rendering Civil Reliefs Redundant"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Partition Suit After Grant of Probate — “Testamentary Jurisdiction Prevails Over Civil Claims, Rendering Civil Reliefs Redundant”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit for partition and other reliefs, holding that “nothing further survives in the present suit” after probate of the Will dated…
Posted by Rawlaw June 2, 2025
Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Trademark Due to Failure to Issue Mandatory Form O-3 Notice — "Removal Without Compliance with Section 25(3) TM Act Procedure is Illegal"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Trademark Due to Failure to Issue Mandatory Form O-3 Notice — “Removal Without Compliance with Section 25(3) TM Act Procedure is Illegal”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed the Registrar of Trade Marks to: Restore and reinstate the petitioner’s trademark MILTON/ bearing application no. 627446 in…
Posted by Rawlaw June 2, 2025
Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for "ONE FOR ALL" Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for “ONE FOR ALL” Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, upholding the Registrar of Trade Marks’ refusal to register the mark…
Posted by Rawlaw May 31, 2025
Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused Named as “Bhaiya” by Prosecutrix — “No Clear Role Established in Alleged Sexual Offences, No Incriminating Evidence in Statements Under Sections 161 or 164 CrPC”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused Named as “Bhaiya” by Prosecutrix — “No Clear Role Established in Alleged Sexual Offences, No Incriminating Evidence in Statements Under Sections 161 or 164 CrPC”

Court’s DecisionThe Delhi High Court allowed the regular bail application filed by the accused in FIR No. 197/2024 registered under Sections 323, 328, 342, 354D, 363, 376, 506, 109, 34…
Posted by Rawlaw May 31, 2025
Delhi High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Direction to Fill Posts Under Repealed Quota Rules — “Right to Be Considered for Promotion Arises on the Date of Consideration, Not Vacancy” — Amendment Process Cannot Be Undermined by Judicial Direction
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Direction to Fill Posts Under Repealed Quota Rules — “Right to Be Considered for Promotion Arises on the Date of Consideration, Not Vacancy” — Amendment Process Cannot Be Undermined by Judicial Direction

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and quashed the order dated 16.12.2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025
Delhi High Court Allows Registered Will Despite Delay — “Justice Can’t Be Denied for a Procedural Lapse When No Prejudice Is Caused”: Permits Stronger Evidence in Probate Case with ₹25,000 Cost for Late Filing
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Allows Registered Will Despite Delay — “Justice Can’t Be Denied for a Procedural Lapse When No Prejudice Is Caused”: Permits Stronger Evidence in Probate Case with ₹25,000 Cost for Late Filing

Court’s Decision The High Court of Delhi overturned the trial court’s decision, which had refused to allow a certified copy of a registered Will to be placed on record in…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025
Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process

1. Court’s Decision The High Court upheld the trial court’s ruling, dismissing the appellant’s appeal and affirming that the respondent was the rightful owner of the property. Since the appellant…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 49 50 51 52 53 … 82 Next page

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court – “Infrastructure developer eligible for tax deduction under income tax law; contractor argument rejected”, revenue appeals dismissed
  • Bombay High Court — “NIA trafficking and cyber fraud case: bail refused as court finds strong prima facie conspiracy”, accused likely to tamper with evidence
  • Bombay High Court — “MPID Act attachment proceedings not stayed by insolvency moratorium under IBC; investor protection prevails”, appeal dismissed with ₹10 lakh costs
  • Bombay High Court — “Tenants who altered structure, acquired alternate residence and caused nuisance liable for eviction”, appellate court findings termed perverse
  • Bombay High Court — “Section 9 interim protection available even after filing enforcement petition for foreign award”, debtor ordered to secure USD 269,105
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top