Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

misconduct

Home - misconduct

supreme court
Posted inNews

Supreme Court upholds removal from service in misappropriation case, holding that “mere deposit of embezzled money cannot absolve misconduct” and judicial review cannot re-appreciate evidence

Court’s decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union and set aside the High Court’s judgment which had quashed the penalty of removal from service. The Court…
Posted by Rawlaw November 18, 2025
promotion
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Rules: “Denial of Promotion to a Rightful Claimant Is a Recoverable Misconduct—Manager Liable to Pay Salary Arrears”, Manager’s Mismanagement Cannot Deprive Teacher of Legitimate Dues

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court, in a significant ruling safeguarding teachers’ service rights, dismissed a writ appeal filed by the Manager and Headmaster of Parudur Higher Secondary School, Palakkad,…
Posted by Rawlaw October 13, 2025
judicial transfer
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Upholds Judicial Transfers: “Integrity in the Judicial System Must Be Beyond Reproach” — Challenge to Transfer Dismissed Amid Allegations of Misconduct

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the transfer orders of Class III judicial employees from Kolhapur to other districts. The Court held that the transfers…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court restores probate and upholds mother’s final wishes — “Suspicious circumstances must be proved, not presumed; unproved allegations cannot defeat a validly executed Will”
  • Supreme Court upholds conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a 4-year-old child, holding that “Medical evidence cannot override consistent ocular testimony,” but reduces sentence from seven to six years
  • Bombay High Court clarifies that “Auction timelines are part of legal proceedings” and holds that the pandemic-period delay in depositing auction amounts stands protected under the Supreme Court’s exclusion order
  • Bombay high court affirms labour-friendly approach, holding that “When an employer does not dispute employment, the workman deserves full protection of industrial justice” in reinstatement appeal
  • Bombay high court upholds preventive detention, holding that “Verification by senior police officers offers sufficient assurance of genuineness” and personal verification by detaining authority is not required
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top