Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Home » Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"
Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Court's Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, which had acquitted the accused, and remanded the matter for further examination. The Court highlighted that under Section 138…
Posted by Rawlaw December 27, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court upholds revocation of letter of administration — “Obtained after 22 years by suppressing widow and daughter; probate court cannot reward concealment” while dismissing heirs’ appeal
  • Delhi High Court grants default bail in NDPS case — “Extension of investigation without producing accused is a gross illegality; right to statutory bail flows from Article 21” while setting aside trial court orders
  • Delhi High Court holds insurer liable for tractor–trolley death and recalculates compensation — “Trailer accident flows from insured tractor; welfare object of Motor Vehicles Act cannot be defeated by technicalities” while marginally enhancing award
  • Delhi High Court declines to quash reassessment at threshold — “Limitation under Section 149 post-Ashish Agarwal requires factual computation by Assessing Officer” while remanding matter
  • Delhi High Court upholds finding on genuineness of Will despite dismissal of probate — “Proof of execution can stand independent of probate relief; secondary evidence admissible on proof of loss” while rejecting son’s challenge
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top