Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Home » Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"
Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Court's Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, which had acquitted the accused, and remanded the matter for further examination. The Court highlighted that under Section 138…
Posted by Rawlaw December 27, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court quashes AIIMS rejection of DM Critical Care Medicine candidature—”1095 days residency can be cumulative across institutions, merit cannot be defeated by technicalities”
  • Delhi High Court acquits municipal officer in 1993 bribery case—”Sanction found mechanical, demand of illegal gratification not proved, conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act set aside”
  • Delhi High Court refuses to set aside arbitral award in semiconductor supply dispute—”No perversity in contract interpretation, Section 34 challenge dismissed”
  • Delhi High Court holds security services tender must comply with statutory supervisor norms and GeM random selection rule—”Arbitrary turnover-based award struck down, writ disposed with binding directions”
  • Delhi High Court permits accused to attend brother-in-law’s wedding under strict police custody—”Interim bail declined, humanitarian access allowed”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top