Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Home - Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: "Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of the NI Act: “Director Cannot Be Held Liable Without the Company Being Made an Accused”

Court's Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, which had acquitted the accused, and remanded the matter for further examination. The Court highlighted that under Section 138…
Posted by Rawlaw December 27, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Restores Consumer Commission’s Order Holding Bank Liable for Fraud: “Illiterate Widow Wrongfully Deprived of Compensation — Bank’s Negligence Cannot Be Overlooked” strengthens consumer protection jurisprudence by safeguarding vulnerable depositors, especially illiterate individuals.
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Educational Trust for Defying Reinstatement Orders: “Willful Disobedience of Judicial Orders Cannot Be Tolerated”
  • Karnataka High Court: Refundable Security Deposit under Lease Not Liable for Stamp Duty — “Refundable Security Deposit Does Not Constitute Money Advanced in Addition to Rent”
  • Karnataka High Court Quashes Murder Conspiracy Case: “No Purpose Will Be Served in Continuing Prosecution When All Witnesses Have Turned Hostile”
  • Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Against Bank’s Recovery Notice — “Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge a Private Legal Notice”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top