Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Supreme Court

Home - Supreme Court - Page 26

Supreme Court Restores FIR Against Rajasthan Official in Corruption Case: "Second FIR Uncovered Systemic Bribery, Quashing It Would Hinder Investigation"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Restores FIR Against Rajasthan Official in Corruption Case: “Second FIR Uncovered Systemic Bribery, Quashing It Would Hinder Investigation”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court overturned the Rajasthan High Court’s judgment, which had quashed the second FIR filed against a government official accused of bribery. The Court ruled that the…
Posted by Rawlaw February 19, 2025
Supreme Court Holds BRO’s Rigid Approach Unjustified, Orders Refund of ₹15.04 Crore Bank Guarantee: "Error in Bid Amount Was Self-Evident and Required No Detailed Justification"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Holds BRO’s Rigid Approach Unjustified, Orders Refund of ₹15.04 Crore Bank Guarantee: “Error in Bid Amount Was Self-Evident and Required No Detailed Justification”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court overturned the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment, allowing the appellant’s appeal. It ruled that the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) should refund the appellant’s ₹15.04 crore…
Posted by Rawlaw February 19, 2025
Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: Interest on Compensation Under Employee’s Compensation Act is Mandatory at 12% Per Annum; Insurer Liable Without Right to Recover from Employer

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court ruled that interest on compensation under Section 4A(3) of the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923, is mandatory at 12% per annum when an employer defaults in…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity can be forfeited if an employee is terminated for misconduct that constitutes…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Ruling: “Vested ITC Rights Cannot Be Arbitrarily Reduced”; Strikes Down Retrospective Restriction on Input Tax Credit Before April 1, 2014
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab and Haryana High Court Ruling: “Vested ITC Rights Cannot Be Arbitrarily Reduced”; Strikes Down Retrospective Restriction on Input Tax Credit Before April 1, 2014

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the State of Punjab, upholding the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s ruling that Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of NOC for Ayurvedic Medical College: “No Indefeasible Right Can Be Claimed Based on an Illegal Grant”; Rejects Promissory Estoppel Plea
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of NOC for Ayurvedic Medical College: “No Indefeasible Right Can Be Claimed Based on an Illegal Grant”; Rejects Promissory Estoppel Plea

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision, affirming that the withdrawal of the No Objection Certificate (NOC) for establishing an Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital was valid.…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025
Supreme Court Restores Insurance Claim, Holds National Permit Valid for Intrastate Use—Orders Insurer to Pay with 9% Interest, Rejects Frivolous Repudiation
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Restores Insurance Claim, Holds National Permit Valid for Intrastate Use—Orders Insurer to Pay with 9% Interest, Rejects Frivolous Repudiation

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and overturned the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's (National Commission) order that denied the appellant's insurance claim. It restored the State Consumer…
Posted by Rawlaw February 17, 2025
Supreme Court Limits Forfeiture in Real Estate Contracts, Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—"Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers"
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Limits Forfeiture in Real Estate Contracts, Declares 20% BSP Deduction Excessive—”Unfair and One-Sided Agreements Cannot Disadvantage Homebuyers”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India partially upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), ruling that forfeiture of 20% of the Basic Sale Price (BSP)…
Posted by Rawlaw February 17, 2025
Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala High Court's Order Granting Compassionate Appointment, Emphasizes Indigence as a Mandatory Criterion—“Compassionate Appointments Are Not an Entitlement but an Exception”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala High Court’s Order Granting Compassionate Appointment, Emphasizes Indigence as a Mandatory Criterion—“Compassionate Appointments Are Not an Entitlement but an Exception”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court overturned the Kerala High Court’s orders that had directed the appointment of the respondent on compassionate grounds under the 1993 scheme of Canara Bank. The…
Posted by Rawlaw February 17, 2025
Supreme Court Condemns Employer for Suppression of Evidence as "Fraud on Court," Upholds Reinstatement of Wrongfully Dismissed Bus Driver, Awards 75% Back Wages and Full Terminal Benefits
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Condemns Employer for Suppression of Evidence as “Fraud on Court,” Upholds Reinstatement of Wrongfully Dismissed Bus Driver, Awards 75% Back Wages and Full Terminal Benefits

Court's Decision: The Supreme Court upheld the reinstatement of the dismissed employee (a bus driver) with 75% of back wages from the date of termination until superannuation. It also directed…
Posted by Rawlaw February 15, 2025

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 … 24 25 26 27 28 … 45 Next page

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Courts cannot stall delimitation mid-election— “Articles 243-O & 243-ZG bar interference; ward formation challenges rejected”
  • Delhi High Court: No writ interference in Labour Court’s reinstatement award— “Security guard held direct employee of EDMC; 75% back wages upheld”
  • Bombay High Court: Stamp duty payable only on NCLT order, not underlying amalgamation transactions — “₹25 crore excess levy quashed; refund with 6% interest ordered”
  • Supreme Court of India: ‘Botched investigation cannot justify conviction’—”Last seen theory collapses, Section 27 recovery invalid; stepfather acquitted in six-year-old’s murder”
  • Bombay High Court: State cannot review land compensation under Maharashtra Highways Act—”Second award based on Chief Minister’s directions quashed”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top