Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Upholds Balance of Rights: “The Necessity of Safeguarding a Senior Citizen’s Right to Live with Dignity Needs No Emphasis”

Home - Upholds Balance of Rights: "The Necessity of Safeguarding a Senior Citizen’s Right to Live with Dignity Needs No Emphasis"

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act, Upholds Balance of Rights: "The Necessity of Safeguarding a Senior Citizen’s Right to Live with Dignity Needs No Emphasis"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act, Upholds Balance of Rights: “The Necessity of Safeguarding a Senior Citizen’s Right to Live with Dignity Needs No Emphasis”

Court's Decision The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of the petitioners (the senior citizen’s son, daughter-in-law, and grandchildren) from the property owned by the senior citizen (respondent). It dismissed…
Posted by Rawlaw January 16, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Rules Workman Not Entitled to Legal Representation in Domestic Inquiry: Holds Legal Representation Only Allowed If Employer’s Presenting Officer is Legally Trained, Inquiry Officer’s Legal Background Irrelevant
  • Supreme Court Upholds Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty: False Allegations of Fraud, Dowry Demand, and Infidelity Justify Decree; Orders Husband to Pay ₹10 Lakh as One-Time Alimony After Marriage Irretrievably Breaks Down
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR Amidst Cross Allegations of Assault and Sexual Harassment, Holds “Existence of a Cross FIR is Not a Sole Ground for Quashing”
  • Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case: Holds Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty or Harassment “Soon Before Death,” Presumption Under Section 113-B Evidence Act Not Applicable Due to Contradictory Testimonies
  • Bombay High Court Upholds Mumbai University’s Decision to Cancel Admission After Two Years: “Court Cannot Direct University to Lower Cut-off Standards; IB Students Must Meet Minimum Eligibility Criteria, Provisional Admission Does Not Create Vested Right”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top