Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Writ Jurisdiction

Home - Writ Jurisdiction

Bombay High Court: “Consent Is the Cornerstone of Arbitration — Non-Signatories Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Without Express Agreement” — Court Quashes Arbitrator’s Order Impleading Bona Fide Purchaser in Real Estate Dispute
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Consent Is the Cornerstone of Arbitration — Non-Signatories Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Without Express Agreement” — Court Quashes Arbitrator’s Order Impleading Bona Fide Purchaser in Real Estate Dispute

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Advait M. Sethna) held that a non-signatory cannot be compelled to arbitrate merely because it purchased property involved in a…
Posted by Rawlaw October 30, 2025
writ
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Reiterates: “When Law Provides a Remedy, Writ Jurisdiction Is Not the First Resort” — Directs Petitioner to Approach Divisional Commissioner Under Bihar PDS Control Order, 2016

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court, presided over by Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, reaffirmed the settled principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution should not be invoked…
Posted by Rawlaw October 23, 2025
pds dealership
Posted inNews

Patna High Court on PDS Dealership Dispute — “Availability of Alternative Remedy Bars Writ Jurisdiction”

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a candidate’s application for appointment as a Public Distribution System (PDS) dealer. The Court held that…
Posted by Rawlaw August 25, 2025
fresh filing
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Grants Liberty to File Fresh Representation Seeking Unpaid Milling and Transportation Charges for Custom Milled Rice, Holding Dispute Can Be Addressed Administratively Before Invoking Writ Jurisdiction

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority within four weeks seeking payment of…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Dismisses-Contractors-Writ-for-Compensation-in-Construction-Dispute-Disputed-Questions-of-Fact-Cannot-Be-Examined-Under-Article-226—Proper-Remedy-Lies-Before-Civil-Court
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Dismisses Contractor’s Writ for Compensation in Construction Dispute: “Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Examined Under Article 226—Proper Remedy Lies Before Civil Court”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation for construction work allegedly executed and raw material lost due to…
Posted by Rawlaw June 26, 2025
dismissed
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Plea Against Redevelopment: “Dispute Between Lessor and Lessee Purely Civil, Not Maintainable Under Writ Jurisdiction”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the redevelopment activities undertaken by a neighbouring society. The Division Bench held that “the issues in this Writ Petition…
Posted by Rawlaw June 23, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Refuses-Payment-Relief-to-Contractor-for-Pending-Bills-in-Government-Bridge-Project-Relief-Cannot-Be-Granted-Under-Article-226-Where-Factual-Controversies-Exist
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses Payment Relief to Contractor for Pending Bills in Government Bridge Project: “Relief Cannot Be Granted Under Article 226 Where Factual Controversies Exist”

Court’s Decision In a judgment dated 9 June 2025, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for payment of ₹76 lakhs in pending bills for a government…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top