Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Writ Jurisdiction

Home » Writ Jurisdiction
Bombay High Court: “Consent Is the Cornerstone of Arbitration — Non-Signatories Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Without Express Agreement” — Court Quashes Arbitrator’s Order Impleading Bona Fide Purchaser in Real Estate Dispute
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Consent Is the Cornerstone of Arbitration — Non-Signatories Cannot Be Dragged Into Arbitration Without Express Agreement” — Court Quashes Arbitrator’s Order Impleading Bona Fide Purchaser in Real Estate Dispute

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Advait M. Sethna) held that a non-signatory cannot be compelled to arbitrate merely because it purchased property involved in a…
Posted by Rawlaw October 30, 2025
writ
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Reiterates: “When Law Provides a Remedy, Writ Jurisdiction Is Not the First Resort” — Directs Petitioner to Approach Divisional Commissioner Under Bihar PDS Control Order, 2016

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court, presided over by Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, reaffirmed the settled principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution should not be invoked…
Posted by Rawlaw October 23, 2025
pds dealership
Posted inNews

Patna High Court on PDS Dealership Dispute — “Availability of Alternative Remedy Bars Writ Jurisdiction”

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a candidate’s application for appointment as a Public Distribution System (PDS) dealer. The Court held that…
Posted by Rawlaw August 25, 2025
fresh filing
Posted inNews

Patna High Court Grants Liberty to File Fresh Representation Seeking Unpaid Milling and Transportation Charges for Custom Milled Rice, Holding Dispute Can Be Addressed Administratively Before Invoking Writ Jurisdiction

Court’s Decision The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority within four weeks seeking payment of…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Dismisses-Contractors-Writ-for-Compensation-in-Construction-Dispute-Disputed-Questions-of-Fact-Cannot-Be-Examined-Under-Article-226—Proper-Remedy-Lies-Before-Civil-Court
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Dismisses Contractor’s Writ for Compensation in Construction Dispute: “Disputed Questions of Fact Cannot Be Examined Under Article 226—Proper Remedy Lies Before Civil Court”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation for construction work allegedly executed and raw material lost due to…
Posted by Rawlaw June 26, 2025
dismissed
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Plea Against Redevelopment: “Dispute Between Lessor and Lessee Purely Civil, Not Maintainable Under Writ Jurisdiction”

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the redevelopment activities undertaken by a neighbouring society. The Division Bench held that “the issues in this Writ Petition…
Posted by Rawlaw June 23, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Refuses-Payment-Relief-to-Contractor-for-Pending-Bills-in-Government-Bridge-Project-Relief-Cannot-Be-Granted-Under-Article-226-Where-Factual-Controversies-Exist
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses Payment Relief to Contractor for Pending Bills in Government Bridge Project: “Relief Cannot Be Granted Under Article 226 Where Factual Controversies Exist”

Court’s Decision In a judgment dated 9 June 2025, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for payment of ₹76 lakhs in pending bills for a government…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top